Constitutional law

Balancing the conflict between religion and the law

South Africa (SA) is a diverse country which embraces various religious communities, including traditional African religions, Jews, Christians, Muslims, Hindus and others. It follows that legal practitioners and the law […]

Read more

Decoding statutory interpretation: An in-depth analysis of the South African Constitutional Court

Pentimenti is a very interesting Italian term, often applied in the study of art where repented traces or sketches concealed by layers of paint soon reveal themselves (Douglas Oliveira Diniz […]

Read more

Checks and balances: Monitoring the separation of power and judicial independence

‘[T]he Constitution, at least per se matter, does not forbid judges to wear two hats; it merely forbids them to wear both hats at the same time’ (Ronald J Krotoszynski […]

Read more

How uneven allocation of police resources results in discrimination of poorer communities

Section 9(3) of the Constitution prohibits unfair discrimination against anyone. This article aims to unpack the most recent judgment handed down by the Constitutional Court (CC) on 19 July 2022 […]

Read more

It is unconstitutional to impose a levy on the constitutional right to protest

The Right to Know Campaign and Others v City Manager of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality and Another (GJ) (unreported case no 49197/2021, 10-6-2022) (Victor J) On 26 April 2022 the Gauteng […]

Read more

Public policy, jus cogens norms and the fiduciary criterion of legitimacy

International law acknowledges and permits governments to govern and implement public policy to protect their citizens against external and internal threats. History teaches that rule by decree during declared states […]

Read more

Constitutional Court sets aside conviction of former law student

Tuta v S (CC) (unreported case no CCT308/20, 31-5-2022) (Unterhalter AJ (Madlanga J, Majiedt J, Mathopo J, Mhlantla J, Theron J and Tshiqi J concurring)) In a matter between Liqhayiya […]

Read more

Doctrine of stare decisis requires courts ‘stand or abide by cases already decided’

Ayres and Another v Minister of Justice and Correctional Services and Another 2022 (5) BCLR 523 (CC) In Ayres, the applicants, Gregory Craig Ayres and Valeri Lazanov Nikolov, applied for […]

Read more

Limiting human rights during COVID-19 – is it only legitimate if it is proportional?

The normative standards in international human rights obligate governments to respect, protect and fulfil the human rights of all people in their territory. The World Health Organisation (WHO) declared COVID-19 […]

Read more

Incorrect legal standard applied? Zuma and the Zondo Commission

Certain values in the Constitution were designated as the foundation of our democracy. Such values must then be observed scrupulously because if these values are not observed and their precepts […]

Read more
X
De Rebus