February 1st, 2013
  • In the article ‘Are provisional sentence proceedings constitutional?’ by Zamazulu Nkubungu, which appeared in 2012 (Oct) DR 30, when the definition of ‘liquid document’ was incorporated from the case of Rich and Others v Lagerwey 1974 (4) SA 748 (A), we inadvertently typed ‘conditional’ acknowledgment of debt as opposed to an ‘unconditional’ acknowledgment of debt. We sincerely apologise for the error. Further, the article stated that the equivalent to r 8 of the Uniform Rules of Court in the magistrates’ courts rules is r 14, whereas r 14A is the more applicable rule.
  • In the article ‘Saslaw conference and AGM: Is the LRA to blame for Marikana? In 2012 (Dec) DR 8 we referred to Feroze Boda as female, when in fact he is male. We apologise for the error.

This article was first published in De Rebus in 2013 (Jan/Feb) DR 11.

De Rebus