P O Box 36626, Menlo Park 0102 Docex 82, Pretoria E-mail: derebus@derebus.org.za Letters are not published under noms de plume. However, letters from practising attorneys who make their identities and addresses known to the editor may be considered for publication anonymously. |
I refer to the recent Supreme Court of Appeal judgment, Democratic Alliance v Minister of Home Affairs and Another (SCA) (unreported case no 67/2022, 13-6-2023) (Zondi JA (Schippers and Matojane JJA and Kathree-Setiloane and Unterhalter AJJA concurring)), wherein it was held that it is indeed unconstitutional should South Africans without first obtaining prior permission from the Minister of Home Affairs be stripped of their citizenship.
The year 1994 heralded a new beginning for South Africa and thankfully we thereafter obtained an exceedingly progressive Constitution. In fact, to counter past imbalances various measures were enacted.
It is truly amazing how it took so long for the requisite section of the South African Citizenship Act 88 of 1995 to be challenged. Logically, just because I decide tomorrow to acquire Japanese citizenship does not mean I have decided to renounce my South African citizenship.
Furthermore, there is no clear criterion as to how exactly citizens who acquire foreign citizenship should lose their South African citizenship. For example, does it apply only to citizens who acquire foreign citizenship by naturalisation only?
What happens in the case of citizens who are deemed citizens of foreign countries automatically by the laws of the said foreign country?
In addition, there is unfair differentiation between South African citizens by birth and South African citizens by naturalisation. The former, even if they lose their citizenship still maintain the right to remain in the country. Does this mean a South African citizen by naturalisation who has lived here for over 30 years must be deported after acquiring foreign citizenship without the requisite permission of the Minister?
This is an old Apartheid relic law whose purpose was to deprive freedom fighters of their nationality. So, it begs the question why would a government, which believes in human rights, and many of its members who suffered for freedom oppose the move to declare the said law unconstitutional?
I sincerely believe, we, members of the legal profession should not keep silent about blatantly unreasonable legislation.
Siyabonga Mkhize LLB (Unisa)
is a legal practitioner in Johannesburg.
This article was first published in De Rebus in 2023 (Nov) DR 4.
De Rebus proudly displays the “FAIR” stamp of the Press Council of South Africa, indicating our commitment to adhere to the Code of Ethics for Print and online media, which prescribes that our reportage is truthful, accurate and fair. Should you wish to lodge a complaint about our news coverage, please lodge a complaint on the Press Council’s website at www.presscouncil.org.za or e-mail the complaint to enquiries@ombudsman.org.za. Contact the Press Council at (011) 4843612.
South African COVID-19 Coronavirus. Access the latest information on: www.sacoronavirus.co.za
|