By Moroke Phajane
Start-up law firms fail as a result of various factors. In 2013, The Mail and Guardian‘s Thought Leader reported that 78 attorneys nationally were struck from the roll in 2012 (William Saunderson-Meyer ‘Just trust me I am a lawyer…’ www.thoughtleader.co.za, accessed 4-7-2016). Although these are unofficial statistics and it is not clear what offences were committed by these attorneys, I am certain that most of these disciplinary cases stem from the failure by attorneys to manage sustainable and competitive practices.
But what does managing a sustainable and competitive practice mean? A sustainable and competitive practice, like any other business, is one that is properly positioned to –
Andrew Finlayson, one of the co-founders of a company called Maven Wealth, was asked to reveal the ‘secret of being a good entrepreneur’ (Carin Smith ‘Finlayson brothers tackle wealth management together’ www.fin24.com, accessed 29-6-2016). He responded by stating that it is ‘[t]o have the ability to see what the future may hold and translate that vision into a business strategy that you can implement now’. You can only have the ability to see ‘what the future holds for the business’ if you are properly positioned.
A law firm, like any other business can only be properly positioned if it has a business strategy, which is a plan that sets out how a company will achieve its business objectives. This can be formulated by:
– where the firm wants to be; and
– ascertain how the firm can get to where it wants to be.
Analysing the firm’s current situation
This entails analysing the situation the firm exists or will exist in. This can be achieved by using the analytical tools used by marketers and strategists to conduct a situational analysis, namely, PEST, Competitor analysis, Porter’s five forces, and the SWOT analysis, which are discussed below.
A highly concentrated market may result in customers (buyers) having more bargaining power due to the options available to them. An example of the bargaining power of suppliers is insurance companies that provide legal cover to clients. Such companies have the power to dictate the tariff that will be charged for the services provided by the attorney.
Examples of threats of substitutes include: Companies appointing in-house attorneys to provide legal services in-house instead of briefing external attorneys. In some instances potential clients opt to purchase templates or precedents (namely, wills and lease agreements) that are sold over the counter at some retail outlets instead of procuring the services of an attorney.
Once a firm conducts a situational analysis, the firm is now in a good position to set out its objectives, determine its marketing strategy and plan how it will achieve such objectives.
Moroke Phajane LLB (UFS) Post Grad Dip Business Administration (Milpark Business School) writes in his own capacity and is an in-house attorney at Liberty Life in Johannesburg.
This article was first published in De Rebus in 2016 (Aug) DR 18.
De Rebus proudly displays the “FAIR” stamp of the Press Council of South Africa, indicating our commitment to adhere to the Code of Ethics for Print and online media, which prescribes that our reportage is truthful, accurate and fair. Should you wish to lodge a complaint about our news coverage, please lodge a complaint on the Press Council’s website at www.presscouncil.org.za or e-mail the complaint to enquiries@ombudsman.org.za. Contact the Press Council at (011) 4843612.
South African COVID-19 Coronavirus. Access the latest information on: www.sacoronavirus.co.za
|