Posts tagged as In Re Pennington Health Committee 1980 (4) SA 243 (N)

Unjustifiable restriction of the constitutionally entrenched right of access to courts

x Bookmark This article questions the justifiability of the procedural limitation imposed in terms of s 29(1) of the Magistrates’ Courts Act 32 of 1944 (the Act) with specific reference […]

De Rebus proudly displays the “FAIR” stamp of the Press Council of South Africa, indicating our commitment to adhere to the Code of Ethics for Print and online media, which prescribes that our reportage is truthful, accurate and fair. Should you wish to lodge a complaint about our news coverage, please lodge a complaint on the Press Council’s website at www.presscouncil.org.za or e-mail the complaint to enquiries@ombudsman.org.za. Contact the Press Council at (011) 4843612.

X

South African COVID-19 Coronavirus. Access the latest information on: www.sacoronavirus.co.za

De Rebus

Posts tagged as In Re Pennington Health Committee 1980 (4) SA 243 (N)

Unjustifiable restriction of the constitutionally entrenched right of access to courts

Featured

Legal practitioners can access training grants from SASSETA
October 1st, 2024

A moral compass in employment: Understanding moral clauses in employment contracts
October 1st, 2024

Update

Your Practice

Views

Tools

De Rebus

Posts tagged as In Re Pennington Health Committee 1980 (4) SA 243 (N)

Unjustifiable restriction of the constitutionally entrenched right of access to courts

Featured

Legal practitioners can access training grants from SASSETAOctober 1st, 2024

A moral compass in employment: Understanding moral clauses in employment contractsOctober 1st, 2024

Update

Your Practice

Views

Tools

Legal practitioners can access training grants from SASSETA
October 1st, 2024

A moral compass in employment: Understanding moral clauses in employment contracts
October 1st, 2024